FTS · Behavioral Enhanced Risk Scoring

Familial Trust Score

Childcare, elder care & family services — behavioral safety read by harm class

Individual Lens Childcare Placement Elder Care Family Services
Subject Information
▶ Additional Information (optional)

By running this analysis you certify a permissible purpose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act for this evaluation. This inquiry is logged and tamper-evidenced.

—
Enter subject details and run the analysis
—
FTS · Familial Trust Score · BERS AI LLC
READ Sandbox
Harm Class — Active Variant
Exploitation Risk Neglect Risk Attachment Security Pre-Incident Pathway Impulse Control
91.2
0 — 100
Familial safety indicator — a behavioral read by harm class, not a placement decision. The agency or family decides. Complements, never replaces, mandatory background checks.
▲ Stable trajectory  ·  +0.58 desistance velocity
Behavioral Synthesis

The behavioral record shows no exploitation markers — Dark Triad reads are absent across all three dimensions. Attachment pattern is secure; no insecure or disorganized attachment signal is present. Neglect behavioral patterns are not observed. Impulse control is high. Pre-incident pathway indicators are clear. Social bond anchor is strong. The behavioral safety read across all active harm classes returns protective — no dimension is flagged for human review.

Framework Indicators
Dark Triad — Paulhus & Williams Exploitation 0.02 — Absent Trait · Protective
Attachment Theory — Bowlby / Ainsworth Attach. Security 0.91 — Secure Trait · Protective
Neglect Patterns — systemic read Neglect 0.03 — Absent Behavioral · Protective
Self-Control — Gottfredson & Hirschi Impulse 0.06 — Low Trait · Protective
Meloy TRAP-18 — pre-incident pathway Threat Pathway 0.03 — Clear Gate · Protective
Social Bond — Hirschi Anchor 0.85 — Strong Trait · Protective
Reason Codes
Protective
Dark Triad — Paulhus & Williams (Exploitation markers)
No exploitation markers across Machiavellianism, subclinical narcissism, or psychopathy dimensions. Exploitation-absent is the primary protective signal for care placements involving vulnerable populations.
Protective
Attachment Theory — Bowlby / Ainsworth (Secure Base)
Secure attachment pattern — caregiving orientation is likely nurturing and responsive. Disorganized or avoidant attachment would be flagged for review; neither is present.
Protective
Neglect Patterns — systemic behavioral read
No neglect behavioral signals. Absence of neglect patterns is required for care placements; this dimension is clear across all harm classes in the active variant.
Protective
Social Bond Theory — Hirschi
Strong social bond anchor. Caregiving responsibility is most reliably sustained when the caregiver holds strong institutional and relational commitments — this profile does.
What Would Change This Read

Any exploitation marker — elevated Dark Triad dimension — would immediately flag this read for mandatory human review, regardless of other protective factors. Insecure or disorganized attachment patterns, or emerging neglect behavioral signals, would reduce this indicator and trigger a review flag. This analysis should be refreshed annually for ongoing placements or before placement changes.

Audit ID —
Model Version FTS-1.0 · BERS AI LLC
Mode Sandbox · Synthetic Subject
Permissible Purpose Childcare Placement